Introducing Yourself to a Global Audience
An introductory post or an About Me page. Introduce who you are, say what the blog will be about, and give a stranger a reason to come back.
In the book Your Digital Home
Nine posts. One blog. Fourteen weeks. A blog post is not an essay with a URL on it. It is a piece of writing a stranger chose to finish. This is the largest single thing you will be marked on, and it runs the whole semester.
Read this before you write anything. The rubric at the bottom is the sheet I mark from. Everything above it is how you hit it. The weekly prompt lives in your workbook; this page is the standard every post is held to, every week.
One professional WordPress blog, maintained from Week 2 to Week 15, answering nine prompts in public.
Nine essays uploaded to a website is not a blog. A blog is a body of work with a point of view, read by someone who did not have to click. Ninety percent of web pages get no organic traffic from Google (Ahrefs, 2020). The ones that do get read are not always the best written. They all obey the same structural rules.
Learn the rules. Then write better than everyone who did not bother.
Every post is held against these. Parts 1a, 1b and 1c, made checkable.
The prompt gives you the subject. This page gives you the standard. Both apply. Full briefs and rubrics are on the LMS.
Open the LMS at the week you are in, or use the nine cards below. Each prompt gives you the subject, the length, and what it is marked on. They are released in sequence, not all at once. The sequence is the point: each one assumes you did the one before it.
The live URL. The five on-page elements in place. At least one image, infographic or meme you made yourself, with alt text. A named pillar. And one sentence only you could have written: something you did, saw, or got wrong.
What each one asks for, and what it is actually marked on. The full brief and rubric for every post live on the LMS.
An introductory post or an About Me page. Introduce who you are, say what the blog will be about, and give a stranger a reason to come back.
In the book Your Digital Home
A book, a film, or a restaurant — something inside your niche. Not just thorough: a review that stops the scroll and gets finished. A review no one reads is a review that does not exist.
In the book Write a Review People Finish
Build authority in your niche. The reader should finish it believing you actually know this subject. Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness are each marked separately.
In the book Why Should Anyone Believe You?
A list post that earns its length. Every item worth its own line — a numbered list of obvious things is a listicle nobody shares.
In the book A List Is a Promise About Time
Turn simple data into a clear visual, then tell the story around it. The infographic is a storytelling tool, not decoration. Designed, captioned and cited in Canva.
In the book A Chart Is Not a Story
Make people feel something. Laughter, nostalgia, frustration, pride, quiet recognition. Reach for the moments everyone knows — exam stress, missing home, not fitting in.
In the book Make Us Feel Something
Compare two podcasters in the same field, head to head. Steal what works, avoid what does not. This is market research for the episode you record two weeks later.
In the book Podcasts. Writing for the Ear
You planned it and recorded it. Now publish it. The audio file is not the deliverable — the post is. A good episode buried in a sloppy post loses listeners in ten seconds.
In the book Record, Cut, Publish
The post that frames your finished video series. Preview it without spoiling it, embed the series properly, and reflect honestly on what making it taught you.
In the book Premiere, Then Prove It
The complete instructions for every post, exactly as they appear in the LMS. Click any one to open it.
Welcome to your first WordPress blog assignment.
This is your chance to introduce yourself, your ideas, and the direction of your blog to a real audience. Think of this as your first impression. You are not just telling people who you are. You are showing them what kind of writer, thinker, and creator you want to be.
Your first post should help readers understand you, your interests, and the purpose of your blog. It should also give them a reason to keep reading.
Two things to open before you write. The step by step guide shows this exact post being written on a real blog, weak first draft and all. The finished example shows the standard you are aiming at.
For this assignment, create one of the following on your WordPress blog:
Whichever option you choose, your writing should introduce you clearly and professionally while also explaining what your blog will focus on this semester.
This is not just a personal diary entry. Your audience is public and global, so your writing should be meaningful, purposeful, and interesting to others.
You do not need to answer every question directly, but these can help you build your post:
Be yourself, but be purposeful. Your post should feel natural, warm, and professional. Let your personality come through, but do not be too casual or careless. This is your first step in building your digital presence.
A few important reminders:
Do not wait for the perfect sentence. Start writing.
Your first draft does not need to be brilliant. It needs to exist. Once your ideas are on the page, you can revise, improve, and shape them into something stronger.
Good bloggers do not just write. They rewrite.
This assignment is worth 30 points and will be graded on: audience and purpose, use of images, length and development, invitation for comments and engagement, correct submission of the URL, and writing quality. Check the rubric in the LMS before submitting so you know exactly what is expected.
This is your opportunity to make a strong start. Show some personality. Show some direction. Show that you understand who you are writing for and why your blog deserves attention.
Make it thoughtful. Make it clear. Make it worth reading.
Happy blogging.
Open in the LMS to submit →A review nobody finishes reading is a review that does not exist.
For this post, pick a product, a service, a place, a book, a film, a restaurant, anything inside your niche that you have actually used. Then write the review that stops someone mid-scroll, earns the click, and holds them to the last line. That is a craft problem, not a talent problem, and this brief gives you the five pieces that solve it.
A review is the fastest way to earn the "Experience" part of E-E-A-T, the signal search engines and AI answer engines are both now trained to look for: proof a real person actually used the thing. That is also the whole pitch of your brand, a stranger deciding whether to trust you. Do not write the review the internet already has a hundred of, write the one only you could write, and make it worth someone's four minutes.
Every strong review, anywhere on the web, is built from the same five pieces. Miss one and the review leaks readers.
Readers do not finish things. On a typical post, the click gets you 100%, the first paragraph loses nearly forty percent, the halfway point loses another chunk, and only about one in five reach the end. Every one of the five craft elements above exists to close one of those exits. You are not writing for the 19% who finish anyway. You are fighting for the 38% who almost did.
Go to the Class Blog Directory and use Find Your Reading List to get your four assigned classmates for this round, each linked straight to their Review Post. Leave a real comment that engages a specific point, "great post!" earns nothing. Reply to anyone who comments on yours within a day, while it is still warm.
Name your criteria before you give the verdict. Include the one flaw that almost changed your mind, a review with no weaknesses reads as an ad. And write the verdict like you actually have one: "Track 4 is the reason this album exists" beats "I enjoyed it a lot" every time.
This assignment is worth 50 points, graded on thoroughness and depth, the craft elements (title, hook, headings), writing quality and voice, images, hyperlinks, and a correctly submitted comments section and URL. Check the full rubric in the LMS before you submit.
None of the six most common mistakes on this post are about writing talent, they are decisions you now know how to make. Read it once out loud before you publish. If your first line could open anyone's review of anything, it is not a hook yet.
Open in the LMS to submit →Anyone can post an opinion. This post asks for something harder: writing that feels informed, credible, and useful, and still sounds like you.
By now your blog should be less a place for random thoughts and more a space that reflects what you actually know. This week you go deeper into that space and prove it. Your reader should finish this post believing you understand your niche, not just that you have one.
This is the post where your site starts building real authority, not just posts. Search engines and AI systems are both scoring the same thing now: does this page sound like someone who actually knows the subject, or like a summary of what everyone else already said. Common knowledge, restated, earns nothing, for your rankings or your reader. Say the thing that is actually true and actually yours.
Broad topics are where authority posts go to die. "Fitness" is not a topic anyone can own in one post; "why beginners quit the gym after one month" is. Take whatever you write about and narrow it once, then narrow it again. Specific beats general every single time.
| Too broad | Narrow enough to own |
|---|---|
| Fitness | Why people quit the gym after one month · recovery habits for busy students |
| Music | Why vinyl culture still matters · how DJ culture has changed |
| Travel | Neighbourhoods tourists ignore · budget travel for students in Korea |
You can build authority with a trend post, an opinion piece, a how-to guide, a case study, a comparison of tools or brands, a personal reflection, a myth your niche keeps getting wrong, a resource list, or a discussion of ethics or change in your field. Pick whichever direction actually fits your blog and your reader.
A good authority post is not "this is what I like." It is "this is why this matters, and here is what you should notice." Ask why your topic matters right now, what is changing in it, what your audience still misunderstands, and what makes your perspective useful here specifically.
"It can be argued that adherence rates among novice trainees are subject to numerous contributing factors" is not authority, it is a disguise. "Most beginners quit in week three. I did too, and the reason was boring: nobody told me what to do on the days I felt fine" is authority. Expertise is what you know. Trust is what you let the reader verify.
Worth 70 points, the largest single post so far, with Expertise, Authority, Trust and Voice each marked separately at 10 points, plus additional marks for structure and sourcing. Check the full rubric in the LMS before you submit.
I am not looking for a longer post, I am looking for a stronger one. Show me you understand how real blogs build trust, and that your niche means more because you actually have something to say about it.
Open in the LMS to submit →Seven items means seven payoffs. A list post only earns its format when every single entry gives the reader something they can actually use before lunch.
This week you build a listicle: a post structured as a list, where the list itself is the argument. It should be genuinely useful, genuinely scannable, and it should sound like you the whole way through, not like a neutral list a search engine generated.
A listicle is the format most likely to feel disposable, and the format most likely to get read, so it is the best place to practice the difference. The version that ranks and gets shared is not the one repeating advice already on page one of Google, it is the one with a genuinely new angle and your actual opinion in it. Same structure, different standard: useful and new, not just organized.
Pick something inside your niche that solves a real problem your reader has. Think about what they actually need before you think about what is easy for you to write. The strongest posts go beyond basic information, so choose a topic where you can offer real insight, not just repeat what everyone else already says.
"Form is important when exercising. Bad form can lead to injuries" is description. "Film your third set, not your first. Everyone looks fine when fresh, fatigue is where the form breaks" is advice. A neutral list is a search result. A list with your opinion in it is a blog post.
Every list item needs at least one media element: an image, an infographic, a chart, a Google Maps embed, a short video, an internal link to one of your own earlier posts, or an external link to a credible source. If item nine has nothing to show, it usually has nothing to say, cut it or find the visual.
Your introduction's only job is proving the list is worth the next four minutes: open with a statistic, a question, or thirty seconds of your own experience, then say plainly what the reader walks away with. Your conclusion should summarise the real takeaways and end with a clear call to action, try the tips, leave a comment, share the post.
Read item six out loud. If it sounds like filler, your list was five items all along, and that is fine, seven strong items beats ten soft ones. Run your draft against the Nine C's from the workbook: clear, concise, concrete, correct, coherent, chunked, clickable, connected, and closing on a real next step.
Worth 70 points. Authenticity and Voice carries the largest single share at 20 points, with List Item Quality and Topic Relevance marked separately at 10 points each, plus the remaining marks on structure, media and links. Voice is not a bonus here, it is the biggest line on the rubric.
Think of this as content marketing, you are not only writing, you are standing behind your ideas. Structure, media and real insight are your tools. A list is a promise made ten times, keep all ten or make fewer promises.
Open in the LMS to submit →You ran a real survey this week and got real answers. This post is where you find the one number that surprised you, and build the writing that makes a stranger care about it.
If you built your infographic with a partner, that is fine, plenty of you did. But the blog post itself is yours: your own audience, your own voice, your own interpretation of what the data means.
Original data is one of the strongest authority signals you can put on a site, for a human reader and for an AI summarizing the page: it cannot be found anywhere else, because you are the one who ran the survey. That is the whole purpose of this post, for your brand and your site both. A chart with no story attached is invisible to either audience. The commentary is what makes it worth citing.
The infographic is a storytelling tool, not decoration. Do not upload the whole thing at once and call it a post. Break it into sections, one chart or visual at a time, and write the commentary that turns each piece into an argument. The complete infographic goes at the very end, once, as the final image.
Nobody shares a chart. People share what the chart made them realise.
Each section should explain what its visual means and why it matters, using comparisons or examples to help the reader see the connection. A worked example from the same framework: "62% left within ten minutes because of the music. Not the seating, not the price, not the wifi." The chart is the evidence. The commentary is the writing, and the commentary is what gets graded.
Use the same on-page basics from earlier posts: a clear, specific, keyword-carrying title, section headings that guide the reader through the story, embedded links to reliable sources or classmate posts, and descriptive captions with alt text on every visual.
Two comments required on classmates' posts. Use Find Your Reading List on the Class Blog Directory to get your four assigned readers for this round.
Worth 50 points: Results and Storytelling carries the largest share at 15 points, with Structure and Display and SEO and Readability marked at 10 points each, plus Conclusions and Insights. Check the full rubric in the LMS.
The layout is the logic. If the infographic reads out of order, no colour scheme saves it, and if the story is not written in words around it, the chart is just decoration.
Open in the LMS to submit →The best posts do not show, they connect. This week's challenge is to make a post that makes people feel something: laughter, nostalgia, frustration, pride, or quiet recognition.
Think about the moments everyone in this class already knows: exam stress, missing home, not fitting in, finding joy in something small. Turn one of those shared experiences into something visual and honest.
Voice is the one thing a template, a search algorithm, or an AI system cannot fake convincingly, which is exactly why this post exists. Engagement is not decoration on top of good content, for a brand or a site it is the actual goal: a reader who feels something is a reader who remembers your name and comes back. Be new, be specific, be yourself, that is the whole assignment.
You are not inventing the feeling, you are naming it faster and more precisely than anyone else in the room. "Group projects" is a topic. "The moment nobody replies in the group chat" is a feeling. Pick the territory that fits your blog, university life, life in Korea, pop culture, personal growth, and find the specific moment inside it.
"This meme represents the anxiety experienced by students during examination periods" is explaining the joke, and explaining a joke kills it. "Three coffees in and I still cannot remember what the first chapter said. This one is for whoever else is awake right now" is being in it. Second person, present tense, one concrete detail, and an invitation, that is what actually moves a reader to comment.
People pass things on for four reasons: a strong emotion, practical value, a surprise that breaks an assumption, or the social currency of looking funny or informed for sharing it. Correct and well designed is not, by itself, a reason to share. Aim for one of the four, on purpose.
Two comments required on classmates' posts, assigned through Find Your Reading List on the Class Blog Directory.
Worth 50 points. Authentic Voice is the largest single criterion at 20 points, with the GIF worth 15 and the meme worth 10. Voice, again, outweighs the visuals themselves.
Be honest, be a little weird, just do not be boring. The posts that get remembered are the ones where someone reads it and thinks: I have felt that too.
Open in the LMS to submit →This week you are not just reviewing podcasts, you are doing market research for your own episode. In a few weeks you plan, record and edit one yourself, and the fastest way to learn what works in the medium is to listen critically to people already doing it.
Reviewing critically, before your own episode exists, is how you build authority in a medium you have not published in yet. It is also market research: you are learning, in public, what makes a listener stay past the first minute. Both matter for your site and your brand, an audience trusts a creator who clearly understands the format, not just one who has a microphone.
Choose a field you actually care about, K-pop, gaming, fitness, finance, true crime, film, travel, whatever it is, then pick two podcasters working in that same space and put them head to head. Both in English, both at least 15 minutes long, close enough to compare fairly but different enough to actually contrast. Listen to one full episode from each.
Take notes as you go, not for entertainment but for technique. Pay attention to the opening (how do they hook you in the first 60 seconds?), the structure (segments or one loose conversation?), voice and energy, content depth, production quality, and how each one closes. Mark timestamps when something stands out, good or bad, you will need them.
Use headings to organise your sections and cover, in order:
This is the section that ties everything to your own podcast. Name three specific techniques you will adapt, not "be engaging" but the actual move that worked and why. Then name three specific mistakes you will avoid, not "don't be boring" but the actual moment that lost you as a listener. These six lines are the real deliverable, the review is just how you organised the thinking to get there.
Two comments required on classmates' posts, assigned through Find Your Reading List on the Class Blog Directory.
Worth 50 points. Your Opinions carries 15 points, the Head-to-Head comparison 8, and the Steal/Avoid section 8, with the remainder on structure and sourcing.
Every podcaster you listen to this week is teaching you something for free. Your job is to notice, write it down, and actually use it when it is your turn behind the mic.
Open in the LMS to submit →You planned it, you recorded it, now you publish it. This is the final step in the podcast project, and where a lot of students lose points they should not. The audio file is not the deliverable, the post is. A great episode buried in a sloppy post still loses listeners in the first ten seconds.
Treat this the way the stronger podcaster from your Podcast Review treated their own show page: clean, organised, branded, professional. Three things, in order: make people want to listen, make it easy to listen, make it look like you meant it.
This is where authority meets discoverability. You made something real, that is the E-E-A-T case for you as a creator, but if the post is not built so a stranger and a search engine can actually find and finish it, none of that authority reaches anyone. Publishing well, on purpose, is its own skill, separate from producing the episode, and it is the skill this post is grading.
Upload your finished episode to SoundCloud, Podbean, or another platform that supports embedding, then embed the player directly into the post so it plays without leaving the page. A link to SoundCloud is not an embed, and a broken embed is worse than no embed. Open the published post in a private browser window and press play before you submit.
Write a short intro that creates curiosity without giving everything away: the topic and why you chose it, the format (interview, discussion, storytelling), the main ideas you explore, and one real hook, a surprising fact or a great line from your guest, teased and never resolved. Think back to whichever podcaster won your Podcast Review, borrow their energy for the open.
One or two sentences, specific, not "everyone." "This episode is for university students thinking about studying abroad in Korea" is an audience. Then show, briefly, how your style and topic choices actually serve that listener.
At least three supporting visuals: photos of you or your guest, screenshots, graphics, or imagery tied to the topic, each with a one-line caption explaining why it is there. A photo of your guest during their introduction is meaningful. A stock photo of a microphone is not. Place them through the post to break up the text.
Your logo goes in two places: inside the SoundCloud widget as the episode artwork, and visibly placed in the post near the embed. Recommended size 1500x1500px, square. A clean logo signals you took this seriously, a blurry one or none at all signals the opposite.
H2 and H3 headings to break the post into sections, short paragraphs of two to four sentences, relevant keywords in the title and first paragraph, and internal or external links where they add real context, to your guest's work, related articles, or your own earlier posts.
Close with one topic you would explore next: what it is, why it is worth listening to, and what angle would make it different. This shows you are thinking like a creator with a long view, not someone closing out an assignment.
Write three honest paragraphs in the submission text box: what you actually learned (specific, not "I learned how to interview"), what was genuinely challenging or surprising, and what you would change next time, the most important paragraph of the three. Do not perform humility, be honest, the students who write real reflections improve fastest.
Worth 50 points: Voice carries 15, the Audio Embed 8, and the Reflection 10, with the remainder on media, structure and SEO.
If your post makes someone want to listen, makes it easy for them to listen, and looks like you meant it, you have done the assignment.
Open in the LMS to submit →This is the post that frames your finished video series, the last thing you publish this semester. It should preview the work without spoiling it, embed the series properly, and reflect honestly on what fifteen weeks of making this actually taught you.
This is the post someone actually searching your name will find, an employer, a future collaborator, future you. It is the proof, in writing, that the growth this semester was real and specific to you, not a template anyone could have filled in. Say something true and new here, not the polished, generic wrap-up everyone is tempted to write.
Your reader should finish this post curious enough to press play, not already knowing how it ends. Tease the best moment, do not resolve it. If your preview gives away every key beat, there is nothing left for the video to do.
This is where the marks actually are. Say what you learned that is specific, not a summary of what you did. What was harder than you expected, editing, filming, hearing your own voice back, and what would you do differently if you started the series again tomorrow. Genuine growth reads completely differently from a checklist, and it is easy to tell the difference.
Embed your YouTube or Vimeo video directly into the post so your reader can watch without leaving the page, no bare links. Test it on both desktop and mobile before you submit, most of your classmates will open this on a phone.
Watch and comment on 10 classmates' final videos, assigned to you on the LMS after the due date, you get one day to complete this. Skipping it means no grade for your video, so do not leave it.
Worth 50 points. Authenticity and Personal Voice is the largest single criterion at 20 points, with the Preview worth 8 and the Reflection worth 5, alongside marks for a correctly embedded, correctly positioned video.
Fifteen weeks ago none of this existed. This post is where you get to say, plainly, what you built and what it cost you to build it. Make it unforgettable.
Open in the LMS to submit →Four minutes, every week. It is the difference between a 70 and an 85.
470 points across nine posts. Every post carries its own rubric on the LMS — these are the point values.
| Post | Week | Points |
|---|---|---|
| #1 Introducing Yourself to a Global Audience | Week 2 | 30 |
| #2 Review Post | Week 3 | 50 |
| #3 The "E-A-T" Post | Week 4 | 70 |
| #4 The Listicle | Week 4 | 70 |
| #5 Infographic Post | Week 5 | 50 |
| #6 Meme / GIF Post | Week 6 | 50 |
| #7 Podcast Review | Week 7 | 50 |
| #8 Podcast Premiere Post | Week 9 | 50 |
| #9 Vlog Post | Week 15 | 50 |
| Total | 40% of the course | 470 |
Voice is the largest single criterion in five of the nine posts. Authenticity and Voice is worth 20 of 70 on the Listicle, 20 of 50 on the Meme post, 20 of 50 on the Vlog post. Across the whole project it outweighs formatting, images and links combined.
That is deliberate. Structure is checkable and you should simply get it right. Voice is the part that is actually hard, so it is the part that carries the marks.
The criterion worth 20% here is the one a model cannot produce for you. A model writes a competent post about your niche in nine seconds. It cannot tell a reader what happened to you last Tuesday. That is the part that earns marks, and the part that earns readers.
Use it to check grammar, test a headline, argue with your outline. Say so when you do. Handing in generated prose as your own is plagiarism under university policy, and it reads, to anyone who has marked a hundred of these, exactly like what it is.