Presentation Skills: Why Your Slide Deck Is Making You Less Persuasive
The slide deck was designed as a support tool. At some point it became the argument. That shift has made professional communication significantly worse. Here is how to reverse it.
There is a presentation format that has become so normalised in professional life that most people no longer notice how badly it communicates. A deck of twenty to fifty slides. Each slide containing two to five bullet points. A presenter reading those bullet points to an audience that can read them simultaneously and faster. An hour spent transferring information that could have been an email. This is not a presentation. It is a document with a live narrator, and it is significantly less effective than either a well-written document or a well-structured presentation would be on its own.
What Went Wrong
The slide deck was originally a visualisation tool designed to show things that words could not carry efficiently. At some point it became the communication itself. Research on presentation effectiveness consistently finds that audiences retain significantly more from presentations built around a clear narrative structure than from presentations built around information transfer via slides. The narrative structure creates a through-line that the audience can follow and remember. The information structure creates a sequence of facts that the audience can follow in the room and forget within forty-eight hours.
The Argument-First Framework
The framework I use builds the presentation in the opposite order from the one most professionals use. Start with the one-sentence conclusion: what do you want the audience to believe, decide, or do differently after your presentation? This is not the topic. It is the argument. “Our Q3 campaign strategy should shift from awareness to conversion” is an argument. “Q3 Campaign Strategy Update” is a topic. Then build the three to five points that lead to that conclusion, each one a claim that needs to be made and supported. Then and only then, identify where visual support would genuinely help. Build the slides in service of those specific moments. Delete everything else.
The Length Problem
Research from presentation design experts including Nancy Duarte suggests that most professional presentations are roughly three times longer than they need to be to make their argument effectively. The rule I apply in my courses: if you cannot make your core argument in five slides or less, you have not finished developing the argument. You have finished collecting the material. Those are different stages of the work, and conflating them is what produces forty-slide decks that leave audiences informed but unpersuaded. A presentation with a clear argument, well-supported, concisely delivered, is one of the most powerful communication tools in professional life. Most presentations are not that.
→ The Writing Lab covers the practical mechanics of professional communication including presentation structure, business writing, and pitch development. Corporate workshops on presentation effectiveness are available through the careercomms.com/work-with-me/“>Work With Me page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are slide decks making professional communication worse?
The slide deck was originally a visualisation tool for things words could not carry efficiently. At some point it became the communication itself. A deck of forty slides with bullet points read aloud is not a presentation. It is a document with a live narrator, and it communicates significantly worse than either a good document or a real presentation would alone.
What is the argument-first framework for presentations?
Build the presentation in reverse order from how most professionals build it. Start with the one-sentence conclusion you want the audience to believe or do. Build three to five points that lead to that conclusion. Only then identify where visual support genuinely helps, and build slides in service of those specific moments. Delete everything else.
How many slides should a business presentation have?
If you cannot make your core argument in five slides or less, you have not finished developing the argument. You have finished collecting the material. Those are different stages of work. Research from presentation designers including Nancy Duarte suggests most professional presentations are roughly three times longer than they need to be.
What is the difference between a presentation topic and a presentation argument?
Q3 Campaign Strategy Update is a topic. Our Q3 campaign strategy should shift from awareness to conversion is an argument. A topic describes what the presentation covers. An argument states what the presentation wants the audience to decide. Presentations built around topics inform and are forgotten. Presentations built around arguments persuade and are remembered.